A Step-by-Step Guide to Getting Mahas
A comedy conversation
by Tai-Pan BobJohnson 178,045 22 04/27/2004 04:50 AM 227 views
|
|
Throughout Earth-month April, I have gone from 21 mahas to 62 mahas. So, since I'm the resident expert on receiving mahas, I'm going to give you some tips on how to get them. I don't want anyone left out.
1. Impersonate George W. Bush. I don't know if it was Republicans who were mad at me for impersonating the president, or if it was Democrats who thought they were really maha-ing the president. . . but this is guaranteed to get you some.
2. Have an article published. There are two possibilities about why this works. The good possibility is that people hold "articles" to a much higher standard than "conversations." The other, more sinister, possibility is that those who have had articles rejected recently feel the need to ruin my joy at getting the front page. It was the highlight of my week; excuse me, I have something in my eye. *Sniff*
3. Start threads like the one I just started (this one that you're reading right now). "I can't take a couple of nega-clicks so I'm starting a huge rant that will just piss people off." It's practically a dare.
4. Post unfunny stuff. The logical part of my brain knows that this is the only tried and tested way of getting mahas. . . but I'm just not a "lone gunman" kinda guy. The other three reasons were on the grassy knoll!
|
|
|
Like This? Rate It!
|
|
Side-splitting
17 votes
5.0
/live?func=new_user&msgid=925120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Hilarious
3 votes
4.0
/live?func=new_user&msgid=925122
Tai-Pan BobJohnson 178,045 22
04/27/2004 04:54 AM
In retrospect, the tone of this is all wrong. It was supposed to be a mildly funny way of complaining. I didn't mean to sound so bitter.
You see, I have to lull you all into a false sense of security until you are in firing range.
|
| |
|
|

|
0 votes
0.0
/live?func=new_user&msgid=925124
Kareno The Awesome 1,253 9
04/27/2004 04:56 AM
I fail to the bad side of getting maha-ed. Didn't godot prove that the mahas still improve your rating? I blame my less than spectacular rating on my four measly mahas.
|
| |
|
|

|
0 votes
0.0
/live?func=new_user&msgid=925128
burn-ed toast 0 0
04/27/2004 05:08 AM
It is from the noob attack as of late, and that nutz Emerson.
All because Jeff went on tv. Blame it on that. Hell, even I saw it coming, and i've only been here like 2 months.
|
| |
|
|

|
Hilarious
2 votes
4.0
/live?func=new_user&msgid=925129
Frogtacular 173,153 25
04/27/2004 05:15 AM
Bob, you're over-thinking it.
If you post it, the mahas will come.
|
| |
|
|

|
Chuckleworthy
1 votes
2.0
/live?func=new_user&msgid=925131
Hammerhead 59,399 14
04/27/2004 05:20 AM
Or just be me (the person who pissed Porkchop off enough to have him maha(tm)* everything I say). I have six or seven actual posts still on the board in five threads. I jumped five mahas(tm) in the last three or four hours, even though I haven't posted anything maha(tm) worthy. Frost you Porkchop.
Thanks for the mahas(tm), dick, keep them coming.
*I don't owe Vlad anything for using that term, I made sure that I use the tm next to it, so it's advertising for him. Vlad, you owe me money. You're giving Jeff a penny, I want a penny too.
|
| |
|
|

|
Chuckleworthy
1 votes
2.0
/live?func=new_user&msgid=925145
Spicey loves TTJ 117,736 36
04/27/2004 08:23 AM
Didn't godot prove that the mahas(tm) still improve your rating?
No, that was a bug that's been fixed. Mahas(tm) negatively affect your ranking. And don't feel too bad, Bob. I've gotten negaclicked a bunch this month and I'm adorable. Something's clearly broken with the click system.
|
| |
|
|

|
0 votes
0.0
/live?func=new_user&msgid=925160
iceftsman 2,131 10
04/27/2004 09:37 AM
Be me... I got 6 last night. I think it was my Elizibeth Smart comment... I thought it was funny.
|
| |
|
|

|
0 votes
0.0
/live?func=new_user&msgid=925168
TableTopJane-Spicey is god 173,958 15
04/27/2004 09:50 AM
"Blah blah blah. I went from 21 to 62."
Big freakin' deal. I went from 31 to 193. I know I earned some of those, but most of them were from porkchop.
|
| |
|
|

|
Side-splitting
11 votes
5.0
/live?func=new_user&msgid=925170
Iceman, now a n00beteran 2,131 10
04/27/2004 09:53 AM
Well... maybe he was offended that your child had one arm.
|
| |
|
|

|
0 votes
0.0
/live?func=new_user&msgid=960173
superturkey 6,678 0
06/14/2004 06:40 AM
i got it figured out.
my goal is to get more maha's than clickies. it is easy if you respond to anything lila says. she is so stupid, she actually explains the fact that she is bored with a post, and maha's it.
while she is so entertained by the post, she will respond to it 15 times. she thinks that is the definition of bored.
Bored= taking 2 hours out of your time to entertain the fact.
therefore, lila's definition is either she is bored, so she maha's everyone, or she is a complete Frost-ing moron who doesn't even know what bored is.
if she knew the definition of bored, she would go elsewhere to have more fun, yet she stays, admitting boredom. i put my vote for a pathetic ass bitch who just needs to shoot herself, and her pretend boyfriend.
|
| |
|
|

|
0 votes
0.0
/live?func=new_user&msgid=960174
superturkey 6,678 0
06/14/2004 06:43 AM
and the reference to 'the boy' is usually reserved for a child.
lila,
are you making a reference to you Frost-ing a 3 year old? that would explain everything.
|
| |
|
|

|
0 votes
0.0
/live?func=new_user&msgid=960217
Dead Robot 67,630 16
06/14/2004 08:39 AM
Here's one...
Post less.
Works for me. Havent got a Nega in days.
|
|
|
|